3 ms·
The counter perspective to this is that Hillary's privately managed server has better audit-ability (and could be interpreted to higher security standards) than
by smileysteve 11y ago
The counter perspective to this is that Hillary's privately managed server has better audit-ability (and could be interpreted to higher security standards) than government IT.
The big "flaw" that I see in this "crisis" is the assumption that government servers (which have knowingly and publicly been hacked: OPM - or have leaks: Snowden) are somehow more secure than a given private server. And we can all probably find both a government and private website that doesn't use TLS/SSL, SPF, or authenticated SMTP.
- pasbesoin 11y agoThank you. I, for one, don't assume government server configuration and management is necessarily better. Another thing that bothers me about Clinton, is that years after Manning's leaks (which I do not condemn, personally), word was/is that State's document / information systems situation is as messed up and deficient as ever. They had a "big problem", by their own definition and rhetoric. Yet, years later -- years under her watch -- apparently nothing substantial has been fixed. (I may be wrong on this, but it's the latest that I recall reading on the matter.)