3 ms·
Wikipedians are often wrong, but have learned to be more vigilant regarding claims about public officials. Selective sourcing and misdirection are even easier
by huac 10y ago
Wikipedians are often wrong, but have learned to be more vigilant regarding claims about public officials.
Selective sourcing and misdirection are even easier when you own the "media" outlet. Brock's takeover of Blue Nation Review is a shameless reshaping of liberal media to fit the Clinton agenda - a super PAC aligned with a candidate owning a "news" source.
It's probably a smart political move this election, but along with the $1M Correct the Record push for online messaging, shows how Clinton can't gather the kind of young grassroots support that Obama and Sanders could.
- tanderson92 10y agoThe "organic" "cross-pollination" is perhaps the most amusing. For example, the non-organic Brock-funded "Bros 4 Hillary" group receives coverage in the Blue Nation Review, and then lauds its accomplishments in grass-roots organizing. Enough to be published even! It's nearly Kafkaesque.