4 ms·
Looks like Elm moved closer to Pux's API by dropping the signals for `Html action`. Check out Pux if you're interested in the same architecture but for PureScri
by dreamdu5t 10y ago
Looks like Elm moved closer to Pux's API by dropping the signals for `Html action`. Check out Pux if you're interested in the same architecture but for PureScript.
https://github.com/alexmingoia/purescript-pux https://github.com/alexmingoia/purescript-pux
- masklinn 10y agoWow, the buttons demo looks very, very close: http://guide.elm-lang.org/architecture/user_input/buttons.html http://guide.elm-lang.org/architecture/user_input/buttons.ht... The biggest difference is that the Elm version of "start a simple application" encapsulates more boilerplate, but I guess pux can do server-side rendering?
- dreamdu5t 10y agoYeah, Pux can do server-side rendering, and PureScript can be used with webpack alongside other JS. PureScript also has a much easier FFI.