3 ms·
That's not correct. You can use the LGPL version of Qt to develop commercial product without paying for a license and while keeping your source proprietary. You
by hermitcrab 11y ago
That's not correct. You can use the LGPL version of Qt to develop commercial product without paying for a license and while keeping your source proprietary. You aren't allowed to statically link Qt under LGPL, but that isn't a big deal.
- anotherevan 11y agoDoes the LGPL deal with the fact that you actually pull in a lot of Qt code in the form in header files into your actual compiled binary?
- hermitcrab 11y agoYes, my understanding is that including headers is not a problem for LGPL. If it was, LGPL libraries would be useless. Note that the LGPL version of Qt doesn't contain everything the commercial version does. But there isn't a lot missing.