3 ms·
I hate to be rude but this author is a dumbass. In big bold letters he has "On a basic level, I don’t have a music collection anymore because Apple made it too
by rocky1138 10y ago
I hate to be rude but this author is a dumbass. In big bold letters he has "On a basic level, I don’t have a music collection anymore because Apple made it too hard and frustrating to maintain one." when instead it should read "I didn't take care of my own music library and instead left it to a third party who didn't do what was in my interest."
- Bartweiss 10y agoI still have a music collection, and am quite happy with it. That's true because I had the sense not to let iTunes within 100 yards of the thing. A better article might be "Apple services are completely incompatible with having a music collection."
- nickbauman 10y agoTechnically Apple is a 2nd party with lipservice toward being a third party. Much of iTunes content comes to users through Apple.
- sfindie 10y agoI have 30,000+ songs in my music library. I've taken the time to meticulously tag each and every song when adding music to my library. I currently use MusicBee and love it. It's somewhat lightweight and its tagging tools are great. I've also used Media Monkey for a few years and that also has great tagging tools, but it's not as lightweight as MusicBee. I only ever use iTunes for purchasing songs I can't get via other channels such as b-sides or whatever.