4 ms·
The criticisms made of Rails in the article have nothing to do with its waning hipness. Rails falls into the trap of mistaking "easy" for "simple".
by namuol 10y ago
The criticisms made of Rails in the article have nothing to do with its waning hipness. Rails falls into the trap of mistaking "easy" for "simple".
- Bartweiss 10y agoI feel like the comment mistook "yesterday's software" for "boring software", which is usually considered a compliment. As you say, the actual article is about how Rails has all of yesterday's flaws, which is pretty much the opposite of "reliable and boring".