>If Carroll is claiming that nothing we learn in the future can possibly feedback into everyday experience He's not claiming that. >And if he's not making tha

>If Carroll is claiming that nothing we learn in the future can possibly feedback into everyday experience He's not claiming that. >And if he's not making that strong claim, the post is pointlessly tautological No quite. The claim is based on experimental evidence we gained from testing the claims of fundamental physics over the last few decades. >What was the point of that post? I honestly don't even. To illustrate how powerful Quantum Field Theory. >We're an inventive animal, and we've been discovering new science That isn't going to change.