>they should be used the other way around if you believe the RFC, although wikipedia also uses this order FYI the spec changed between rfc2916 and rfc3761:

>they should be used the other way around if you believe the RFC, although wikipedia also uses this order FYI the spec changed between rfc2916 and rfc3761: The format of the service field has changed. The old format was of the form "example+E2U", while the new format is "E2U+example". Reason for this change have to with the added subtypes in the enumservice, the ability to support more than one enumservice per NAPTR RR, and a general agreement in the IETF that the main selector between different NAPTR with the same owner (E2U in this case) should be first." Also see: http://www.iana.org/assignments/enum-services http://www.iana.org/assignments/enum-services