> the presumed arbiter of what constitutes "free markets" or "economic freedom" This assumption is ludicrous. I can't even imagine the thought process that wo

> the presumed arbiter of what constitutes "free markets" or "economic freedom" This assumption is ludicrous. I can't even imagine the thought process that would lead you to think that that makes any sense. Being the loudest proponent of your vision of a concept doesn't make you a good arbiter of what constitutes it: in fact it makes you a terrible one. Not that I have as low an opinion of Heritage as I do of them, but do you think the Westboro Baptist Church is the "presumed arbiter" of what constitutes Christianity, simply because they shout the loudest about God?