5 ms·
MMkay, Rails is old and should be replaced. Well... to be replaced you need to use something instead, something at least not worser thann "yesterday’s software"
by out_of_protocol 10y ago
MMkay, Rails is old and should be replaced. Well... to be replaced you need to use something instead, something at least not worser thann "yesterday’s software". Rails still great software, despite its "super slow" negative fame it still pretty damn good at getting things done (also faster than like 80% php frameworks)
I don't see any competitors out there. Well.... Phoenix looks pretty damn good. Still, with not-so-mature ecosystem (~2k packages vs ~100k for ruby, same goes for SO questions/answers, blog posts etc) it can't be solution for everyone as of yet. So... What's the meaning of
- chris_wot 10y agoHalf the things he's complaining about can be fixed by streamlining dependencies. If PHP can sort out their mess with more modular components, seemingly driven by Composer and Syphony, then I can't see why Ruby can't sort themselves out.