This blog post is not constructive. The points are redundant summaries of what everyone already knows, ad-hominem attacks users of gpg based on a straw-man pres

This blog post is not constructive. The points are redundant summaries of what everyone already knows, ad-hominem attacks users of gpg based on a straw-man presumption, and does not educate the reader about how to construct better alternatives. Attacking GPG is "an easy target", and is really cliché - you get to sound profound without actually doing anything constructive. All of the arguments against GPG have analogous counterparts against using X509, yet there is no out-of-the-blue chiding of people who "would voluntarily use" X509.