4 ms·
If this is the state of the art, then we needn't be very worried. The demo site shows horrible results - the same plate is recognized 2 dozen times as different
by roel_v 11y ago
If this is the state of the art, then we needn't be very worried. The demo site shows horrible results - the same plate is recognized 2 dozen times as different numbers every time, over a time span of 2 seconds.
I'm pretty sure there are solutions available that works much better though, my point is that describing openalpr as 'state of the art' isn't quite accurate.
- abrookewood 11y agoI think you are misreading it. It is listing the top 10 possibilities that might represent the number plate and the expected accuracy of each one, with the top suggestion being correct.
- roel_v 11y agoYes I got that part, but it still turns out I'm the idiot here - I had set the view mode to 'individual plates' instead of 'plate groups' (I didn't understand what it was for so I was poking around) and then it shows you the separate images of each car, instead of grouping by car and taking the most likely from several attempts, which was was I complained they didn't do in the GP. When I look at the right data, they get all but one of the two dozen or so I checked right. Impressive (and a bit scary).