5 ms·
There is a difference between brand/product name and product itself. As @dredmorbius mentioned in a sibling comment, IDEs by definition do not "do one thing wel
by friendzis 10y ago
There is a difference between brand/product name and product itself. As @dredmorbius mentioned in a sibling comment, IDEs by definition do not "do one thing well" - various tools are integrated with varying degrees of tightness. Take old VS project, old Eclipse workspace and they have to be first converted to a new format. How can one be sure that there is 1:1 mapping between old and new formats?
Having worked on VS6 does not guarantee that old tips&tricks will be valid in VS2016 or VS2030. Imagine if they decided to switch from VC to clang - it is integral part of VS and cannot be dismissed. Even though I'm not emacs user I'm pretty confident that overwhelming majority of what I learn today about the tool will be valid 20 years later.
- vintermann 10y agoHaving worked on VS6 does not guarantee that old tips&tricks will be valid in VS2016 or VS2030. They do if those tips&tricks include basic editing functions, which is what you're talking about if you're comparing it to vi/emacs.
- chriswarbo 10y agoMy "tips and tricks" include how to read email and RSS/ATOM feeds in Emacs, which I do using Gnus. In fact, reading email and RSS/ATOM in Gnus is also a tip/trick, since it was originally written (in 1987) for Usenet. I'm not at all saying that others should use Emacs for their email. I'm pointing out that Emacs customisation can involve far more than "basic editing functions", and that these customisations can continue working for decades.
- vintermann 10y agoPoint is, if you use emacs and vi, you're stuck doing basic editing functions in a different way than the rest of the world. We see vi users adapt to this by trying to cram vi plugins into everything, and emacs users by trying to cram everything into emacs.
- yoplait_ 10y agoNot stuck, empowered