3 ms·

If you don't care to refute facts, that's fine. But you don't have to rage-quit in such a childish fashion. Save that for reddit.

by hueving 11y ago

etherael 11y ago
You have no facts. Merely an ideology you are wedded to and will insist on pushing regardless of the facts even when directly confronted with them, and having simple mathematical statements you make proven wrong. If the facts damn the state, people like you damn the facts, and therefore there is no reason to discuss anything with you. This is not a rage quit anymore than realising that confronting a Christian with the fact that various points of their faith are simply scientifically impossible and thus factually incorrect. We are playing different games and care about different things. You don't care about truth and I don't care about your political agenda. We start from completely different premises and have zero regard for the premises of our opposite, therefore discussion is useless.
dang 11y ago
Your comments are breaking the HN guidelines by being uncivil. We ban accounts that do that, so please don't do that. Instead, edit the uncivil bits out or don't post until you can comment without them. This is especially important when another person is being wrong and/or provocative. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html
- hueving 11y ago
  The parent accused me of being a shill and I said that was a childish way to end an argument. The civility guideline is this: >Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face-to-face conversation. Avoid gratuitous negativity. If someone called me a shill to my face, I would call them childish in person as well. Can you let me know what I said that resulted in this threat of banning? I will be happy to stop commenting on this site and show myself the door if I cannot respond to accusations.

If you don't care to refute facts, that's fine. But you don't have to rage-quit in such a childish fashion. Save that for reddit.

by hueving 11y ago

If you don't care to refute facts, that's fine. But you don't have to rage-quit in such a childish fashion. Save that for reddit.

etherael 11y ago

You have no facts. Merely an ideology you are wedded to and will insist on pushing regardless of the facts even when directly confronted with them, and having simple mathematical statements you make proven wrong. If the facts damn the state, people like you damn the facts, and therefore there is no reason to discuss anything with you. This is not a rage quit anymore than realising that confronting a Christian with the fact that various points of their faith are simply scientifically impossible and thus factually incorrect. We are playing different games and care about different things. You don't care about truth and I don't care about your political agenda. We start from completely different premises and have zero regard for the premises of our opposite, therefore discussion is useless.

dang 11y ago

Your comments are breaking the HN guidelines by being uncivil. We ban accounts that do that, so please don't do that. Instead, edit the uncivil bits out or don't post until you can comment without them. This is especially important when another person is being wrong and/or provocative. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

hueving 11y ago
The parent accused me of being a shill and I said that was a childish way to end an argument. The civility guideline is this: >Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face-to-face conversation. Avoid gratuitous negativity. If someone called me a shill to my face, I would call them childish in person as well. Can you let me know what I said that resulted in this threat of banning? I will be happy to stop commenting on this site and show myself the door if I cannot respond to accusations.