3 ms·
This is a problem that we can fix just by throwing data at it. Now that it's possible for any app to know what routes people actually take, we can do even bette
by jakevoytko 10y ago
This is a problem that we can fix just by throwing data at it. Now that it's possible for any app to know what routes people actually take, we can do even better. It's possible to generate cost functions based on what people actually do.
This would fix a lot of different types of problems. First: issues like the ones raised in the article. The killer "roads" have never had drivers successfully complete them, so they should have infinite cost.
It would handle construction. If the traffic in a route suddenly falls to zero, or suddenly goes from zero to lots, the cost functions can be updated to reroute.
It would handle dangerous neighborhoods. Route 31 was the most direct route between my first apartment and Pennsylvania. I once followed MapQuest directions on this route, and it turns out that it takes you through the part of Trenton that makes it one of the top-20 most dangerous cities in the nation (at the time). Nobody really drives this way, so it could route people via safer roads.
The problem here is that the companies that already have good databases are probably going to keep them secret, in case they figure out a way to turn that data into more ad revenue
- tremon 10y agoI don't think it's as simple a picture as you paint. The world is not a static place, and there will always be cases where human judgement is required. Consider for example ice roads or mountain passes: thousands of people may ride them on a single day, and the next day the road may be closed off because of frost, thaw or avalanche danger. There is no way you want your car to only consider a different route after ten drivees have lost their life.
- jakevoytko 10y agoWho limited it to one data signal? I sure didn't.