4 ms·
>>It's good for_some_ workers. I do say, it is good for many workers in today's knowledge based industry. I have mentioned it earlier also. As far as cohorts
by tmptmp 10y ago
>>It's good for_some_ workers.
I do say, it is good for many workers in today's knowledge based industry. I have mentioned it earlier also.
As far as cohorts informal interaction, there are ways to facilitate that too: maybe a actual meeting once a week/month and then you can have private conversation over phone/mail/chat/telegram/whatsapp etc.
- electricEmu 10y agoAll good points. Since we agree neither is perfect for everyone I'm curious how many it would benefit. I guess one indicator may be the competition and availability of remote jobs. Where would someone even look something like that up?
- notmything 10y agoIt would benefit many from a standards of living perspective. The lack of high density housing and removal of urban sprawl would mean that your child will actually know what a nice back yard is rather than having to live above one family and below another; rather than having to hear upstairs use the bathroom at 2am. I didn't care about that when I was 22 and living full on party / work lifestyle but I do care now that I'm 30 and have a child. I really don't like missing my daughters bedtime just because some idiot crashed his car on the bridge (at least once per week) on the way home. By not adopting work from home, you really are making peoples lives worse, just because that;s not you today, doesn't mean it won't be you at some point - wait until you need to buy a house within a reasonable commute to the office; a whole lot of money for no space and living with people banging around above you!