> “If they can’t, turn into nonpaper [with] no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” This is not the smoking gun; there are innocuous readings of that instr

> “If they can’t, turn into nonpaper [with] no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” This is not the smoking gun; there are innocuous readings of that instruction. They were likely using secure channel to transmit nonclasified information — which is something she should be praised for, given how little of what she was up to can be described as good practice. The thread in the printout you link is about "TPs" (presumably Talking Points?). Unlikely to be classified.