5 ms·

It's like Kerry Manning is deliberately ignoring that 18-year-old brains aren't "finished" with respect to judgment and perceiving consequences. Manning's argum

It's like Kerry Manning is deliberately ignoring that 18-year-old brains aren't "finished" with respect to judgment and perceiving consequences. Manning's argument is blatantly circular, simply assuming that Korn is mistaken that there is an issue with late adolescent brains in order to assert that 'programming' late adolescent brains with parenting is the answer. For "the best part," that was really disappointing.

Camillo 10y ago
I'll begin considering this argument when 18 year olds are no longer allowed to vote.
- eru 10y ago
  Why? Voting only has influence in aggregate.
  - ajuc 10y ago
    That's very poor argument.
    - eru 10y ago
      I toned it down from `Voting doesn't change anything on the margin.'
colejohnson66 10y ago
So 18 year old brains aren't fully developers, yet we allow them to drop out of high school, buy a car or house, vote, go to war, get a license without a permit or behind the wheel, etc. Why should driving be any different? Any problems arising out of a bad 18 year old driver are because they don't understand the risks because they've never encountered the consequences.