3 ms·
This was posted a few days ago. I recall that what it actually says is that you can get a warrant to break into the machine even if it can't be proven that the
by Gaelan 10y ago
This was posted a few days ago. I recall that what it actually says is that you can get a warrant to break into the machine even if it can't be proven that the machine is in the jurisdiction of the court giving the warrant, because it is hard to do so when TOR is in use. You still need a valid warrant, it just can come from a different state then where you reside.
- doodles526 10y agoYeah I remember that post. One thing I didn't ask that I meant to. Does anyone know what kind of implications this would have if a warrant is granted for a machine that turns out to reside outside of the USA? Extreme over the top example scenaria: An employee of a foreign government installs Tor on their work machine, does some things meriting an FBI warrant under this decision. The FBI finds a way to access this machine, and in the process accidentally discovers classified information belonging to the foreign government and that government finds the data breach came from the FBI. I may be mistaking, but the decision sounds like an awful lot of trouble preparing to happen with regards to foreign relations.
- Gaelan 10y agoIANAL, but I would think that if you are hiding your identity you lose any rights that come with that.