7 ms·
I think the internet needs an S3 clone, offered by another company. Both companies would be better off because of eachother. S3 is still more reliable than a
by johnrob 19y ago
I think the internet needs an S3 clone, offered by another company. Both companies would be better off because of eachother.
S3 is still more reliable than a couple of dedicated servers, though :)
- iseff 19y agowell, there's Nirvanix (http://www.nirvanix.com http://www.nirvanix.com) which competes with S3.
- randallsquared 19y ago"S3 is still more reliable than a couple of dedicated servers, though " Maybe. I've had colo or dedicated servers since 2000, and the last time I had one fail in any way was in 2001. I move servers every 2-4 years to newer, faster hardware, but even so, my current uptime is longer than S3 has existed.
- foonamefoo 19y agoI was worried people were going to reply with a bunch of anecdotal evidence. Thank you for resisting the urge.
- randallsquared 19y agoI'm not quite sure if you really think I resisted the urge (presumably because I used "maybe"), or if you were being sarcastic. :)