This is the most productive response. However, if we're granting the OP's premise that his N=8 sample needs explanation, then it doesn't seem that anything so

This is the most productive response. However, if we're granting the OP's premise that his N=8 sample needs explanation, then it doesn't seem that anything so simple as religiosity can explain the allegedly dramatic data. Anyways, the grandparent comment ought to be downvoted because his minor contribution does not nearly make up for the damage it does to the tenor of the conversation. If you want to save his contribution, repeat it in a top level comment and link to him for attribution.