5 ms·
As it happens, you can do this with gimel with tiny modifications to the code.
by gingerlime 10y ago
As it happens, you can do this with gimel with tiny modifications to the code.
- stephenr 10y agoSo, as I said. It isn't self-hostable. It has the potential to be made self-hostable, but potential is not the same as current state.
- gingerlime 10y agoSorry, but I don't really understand the negativity and nitpick here. I, and I think many others, will consider it self-hosted. If it doesn't fit in your environment, then the code is dead simple to modify and make self-hostable.
- stephenr 10y ago> Sorry, but I don't really understand the negativity and nitpick here. It's quite simple: you're claiming something that is factually incorrect. Your second sentence is just confusing, because if it were truly self-hostable already, there would be no need to modify it, to make it self-hostable. So, which is it, self-hostable already, or "dead simple" to make self-hostable?
- gingerlime 10y agoIt is self-hostable already in my book (and I believe many others). For those who think it isn't self-hostable - I'm sorry if my definition somehow doesn't fit with your world view. You are still free to use the code and make it fit in whichever definition of self-hostable you believe to be factually correct. I presented not one, but several alternatives to hosting it, and all of them require only minor modification to the code. I think I was clear and upfront about the benefits and limitations of this solution. Splitting hairs over self or not self hostable seems like nitpicking to me.