3 ms·
> The fact that the journalist is obviously aware of the limited scope in the research by stating the caveats makes it unresponsible publishing. I haven't read
by jamesrcole 10y ago
> The fact that the journalist is obviously aware of the limited scope in the research by stating the caveats makes it unresponsible publishing.
I haven't read the article, but isn't it the opposite? Isn't it being responsible to state the caveats?
- Kristine1975 10y agoThis. There are always caveats in an experiment. The fact that they are mentioned in the article is a sign of good reporting by the WSJ.