3 ms·
No, just no. This kind of articles makes me cringe. The fact that the journalist is obviously aware of the limited scope in the research by stating the caveat
by brainpool 10y ago
No, just no.
This kind of articles makes me cringe. The fact that the journalist is obviously aware of the limited scope in the research by stating the caveats makes it unresponsible publishing.
- jamesrcole 10y ago> The fact that the journalist is obviously aware of the limited scope in the research by stating the caveats makes it unresponsible publishing. I haven't read the article, but isn't it the opposite? Isn't it being responsible to state the caveats?
- Kristine1975 10y agoThis. There are always caveats in an experiment. The fact that they are mentioned in the article is a sign of good reporting by the WSJ.