7 ms·

I owe you a long, private email (I'm a fan of your work.. and an ex Microsoft dev manager) but the way this was handled was not good. A RC that wasn't, public f

by tacos 10y ago

I owe you a long, private email (I'm a fan of your work.. and an ex Microsoft dev manager) but the way this was handled was not good. A RC that wasn't, public fumbling, throwing away schedules, and you can't even come up with a sane name for the damn thing. Too early, too weird, and poorly managed. For such an amazing, important technology that's such a massive leap forward in size and interoperability! It smelled like OneDrive. And I'll provide this quote to demonstrate the type of insanity that leaks out of my beloved Redmond on occasion... "Prior to Windows 8.1, we had two sync experiences. One used on Windows 7/8/Mac to connect to the consumer service, and a second sync engine to connect to the commercial service (OneDrive for Business). In Windows 8.1 we introduced a third sync engine..." Current beef is the BashOnWindows alpha. Why was this pushed out so early? Quite literally nothing works on it. The forward progress even in the past few weeks is impressive but... it's bad. Ubuntu Trusty was a weird release to begin with and now it's in a weird time in its lifecycle where it's very difficult to get modern versions of gcc, clang, python 3.5 or even ffmpeg. Not that you could run cmake anyway. But meanwhile you shipped bits where "apt-get update" itself failed right out of the box. I don't get it. EDIT: HN is limiting my ability to reply to you Scott but my frustration with Bash on Windows is both. The quality of the early bits is poor and I find the timing weird. Likewise Trusty itself is at a maximally frustrating stage of its lifecycle for anyone new jumping in (Stack Overflow is already filling up with newbie Bash/Ubuntu questions that are often tied to Windows bugs. And geeze, just let the insanity of that sentence sink in.) From a technical perspective I don't love the alpha. From a dev/engineering/coder perspective I don't love Trusty. From a strategic perspective, just like .NET Core, I'm wondering WTF is going on, thus the rant.

shanselman 10y ago
Maybe we'll have to agree to disagree. The public asked for open and we gave them Open with a pretty capital O. When this project started we didn't know we were buying Xamarin, so that required a pivot. Yes it looked messy because it was messy. It's hard to be Open AND Organized. Node is a mess, remember io.js? Software Development is messy and this was a peek into the kitchen. I can't speak to OneDrive, but it's clearly a problem. Unfortunately, I work in DevDiv, not Windows. As far as Bash is concerned, I think "literally nothing works" is not fair. I helped with this release. I presented on it for 90 minutes this morning and installed and brought in build-essentials, worked on redis-server, g++, ruby, and it worked fine. Yes there's rough areas, but we can update it often with WU. Also, you're complaining about Trusty in the same breath as Bash on Windows. You'll be able to update to 16.04 later so that might help. And, you're certainly able to Hyper-V any Linux and SSH in as well.
- dizzy3gg 10y ago
  I for one have enjoyed the dnx/dotnet cli journey and have engaged in communities I never knew existed. Thanks.
- tacos 10y ago
  I'll give a polite tip of the hat but warn that cutesy redis demos are starting to wear thin. The C++ support in the tools you get after installing build-essentials on Trusty smells like Visual Studio 2010. As for .NET core, you'll get plenty of warm fuzzy "just happy to be part of the journey" crap here but don't forget that for every unemployed enthusiast chatting in an issues thread on github there are 100 professionals working their asses off trying to ship solutions. That's why you exist. Don't lose that. "Things may not work perfectly, but that is why it's no production code." Ugh. They called it a Release Candidate! And it was... crap. Tools support isn't like horseshoes, almost doesn't count. Likewise you need breadth and depth with your Linux support or this is going to be a total friggin' debacle for devs.
  - shanselman 10y ago
    So is it BashOnWindows that is the problem, or a frustration with Trusty itself as a distro?
  - voltagex_ 10y ago
    What demos do you want? If redis is "cutesy", what isn't?
    - tacos 10y ago
      Something hip like one of the neural toolkits? I guess that would be hard to do since you can't install CUDA, R packages or the JDK at the moment. Maybe run Docker? Nope. Heck, I'd settle for being able to run tar or rar. Those don't work either. Cmake? Nope, broken. Valgrind? nope. Mono? nope. He's welcome to run the same redis demo he does every tradeshow and pretend everything's hot and ready for action, but it's misleading at best.
UK-AL 10y ago
Literally the only person who I've met thats made an issue out of this
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
manigandham 10y ago
Timing is a "problem" completely in your control - just don't use it. Also applies to the other problem of it being bad or you not liking it - just don't use it. I do agree that OneDrive sucks and is the worst syncing software available.
- tacos 10y ago
  When I am presented with a tool, a ship date, and a release candidate -- I set my timing and expectations accordingly. When those expectations are not met, you're correct -- I don't use it. I also provide what the Redmond boys call "feedback." Having worked there it's easy for me to spot the knucklehead behaviors they tend to fall into. Inability to name or ship a product plus goofy tech decisions (like shoving everything they can't quite figure out into this "middleware" hole) usually means developer pain ahead.
bitcrazed 10y ago
PM for Bash on Windows here. In answer to some of your questions: "Current beef is the BashOnWindows alpha. Why was this pushed out so early?" We released this feature early because we wanted to get it into the hands of the community in order to learn how they'd use it, what tools they'd run on it, how it would stand-up to real-world use, etc. And the community has been AWESOME, filing lots of bugs (https://aka.ms/winbashgithub https://aka.ms/winbashgithub) and engaging in an overwhelmingly positive and supportive manner. Thanks to all of you that have provided your feedback. "Quite literally nothing works on it." This is just not accurate. There are a large number of things that do work surprisingly well on Bash/WSL, even in this early stage in its development. While Scott and I were on Skype, prepping for //Build, I curl'ed the Redis source tarball, unzipped it, apt-get install build-essential, built, and ran Redis, within minutes, without any modifications. Are there many things that don't work? Yes. Absolutely. We've been very, VERY transparent about this and, in fact, state explicitly in our intro video (https://aka.ms/winbashav https://aka.ms/winbashav) and our announcement (https://aka.ms/winbashann https://aka.ms/winbashann) that there will be many gaps and that lots of things won't work. But let's be fair here, we're talking about an early beta feature in early builds of a beta OS that you choose to download for free. If you don't know that you're going to experience issues, you should not be running Insiders builds. "Ubuntu Trusty was a weird release to begin with" No, it's not. That you don't like it is merely a reality of the Linux ecosystem: Ask 100 Linux dev's which distro to use and you'll get perhaps 20 suggestions - Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, Fedora, CentOs, RedHat, Suse, Gentoo, etc. WSL is designed to be distro agnostic, but we had to start somewhere, so we chose a stable, supported distro's that is very popular with developers - Ubuntu 14.04. We plan on supporting other distro as we expand and improve our implementation of WSL. "it's very difficult to get modern versions of gcc, clang, python 3.5 or even ffmpeg" Really? You're suggesting you don't build everything from source??? ;) Realistically, we're aiming to benefit the most developers possible with this first release - there are far more developers using 14.04 right now than newer versions. And there's FAR more existing code targetting 14.04 era toolsets than the latest and greatest. We'll get there, but you'll have to be just a little patient while we improve the breadth and depth of WSL's implementation.
- tacos 10y ago
  First of all: software development 101. Is WSL even remotely feature-complete? So let's not call it a beta. I'm not sure why you guys have such a hard-on for Redis, but... whatever. It is clean code that compiles on old toolsets. Much other code does not. Keep rocking those Redis demos, setting and getting values is fascinating. :) Debating distros is pointless but I have noticed that Ruby (and oddly, Microsoft folk) tend to land on Ubuntu. Fine, no big deal. But Trusty was a weird release for them -- and the Canonical packages sort of suck. It's mid-2016. How much C++14 support would you expect to get from installing build-essentials? Shouldn't it compile code I'm writing in Visual Studio 2013? Would you expect to have Python 3.5 available? Would you expect to be able to type "apt-get install ffmpeg"? For various reasons these basic things do not work on Trusty. And then you made it worse by shipping bits that didn't even handle apt-get properly. I'm not anti-Ubuntu other than to point out every bag o' bits reaches a point in its lifecycle where it's a total pain in the ass to set up a modern development environment. Trusty is past that point. It's an unfortunate thing to launch with. Not being able to move forward is also unfortunate. Don't punt on that, trust me. If WSL actually worked, people would be screaming about that instead of all these noise bugs. You'll see. If you want to triage this, get Canonical to offer some more modern packages. Again, I'm not sure why Microsoft hopped into bed with Canonical (especially on the Azure/container side)... but ok. Now get them to ease some pain. I shouldn't have to install a half-dozen shady PPAs to try the stuff that hits the HN homepage every day. And I truly despise this "let's see what the community wants" fake project management technique. You know damn well what features you need to implement. You knew damn well what C99 stuff was needed 10 years ago. "Send us a note if it doesn't work" is lazy, shortsighted and damaging to all parties. It's community management, not engineering. Project Management via squeaky wheel is just stupid in 2016. It didn't work prioritizing C99 features and it's a particularly stupid way to implement a shim library for Linux userspace. This is Open development done wrong.

by tacos 10y ago

shanselman 10y ago

Maybe we'll have to agree to disagree. The public asked for open and we gave them Open with a pretty capital O. When this project started we didn't know we were buying Xamarin, so that required a pivot. Yes it looked messy because it was messy. It's hard to be Open AND Organized. Node is a mess, remember io.js? Software Development is messy and this was a peek into the kitchen. I can't speak to OneDrive, but it's clearly a problem. Unfortunately, I work in DevDiv, not Windows. As far as Bash is concerned, I think "literally nothing works" is not fair. I helped with this release. I presented on it for 90 minutes this morning and installed and brought in build-essentials, worked on redis-server, g++, ruby, and it worked fine. Yes there's rough areas, but we can update it often with WU. Also, you're complaining about Trusty in the same breath as Bash on Windows. You'll be able to update to 16.04 later so that might help. And, you're certainly able to Hyper-V any Linux and SSH in as well.

dizzy3gg 10y ago
I for one have enjoyed the dnx/dotnet cli journey and have engaged in communities I never knew existed. Thanks.
tacos 10y ago
I'll give a polite tip of the hat but warn that cutesy redis demos are starting to wear thin. The C++ support in the tools you get after installing build-essentials on Trusty smells like Visual Studio 2010. As for .NET core, you'll get plenty of warm fuzzy "just happy to be part of the journey" crap here but don't forget that for every unemployed enthusiast chatting in an issues thread on github there are 100 professionals working their asses off trying to ship solutions. That's why you exist. Don't lose that. "Things may not work perfectly, but that is why it's no production code." Ugh. They called it a Release Candidate! And it was... crap. Tools support isn't like horseshoes, almost doesn't count. Likewise you need breadth and depth with your Linux support or this is going to be a total friggin' debacle for devs.
- shanselman 10y ago
  So is it BashOnWindows that is the problem, or a frustration with Trusty itself as a distro?
- voltagex_ 10y ago
  What demos do you want? If redis is "cutesy", what isn't?
  - tacos 10y ago
    Something hip like one of the neural toolkits? I guess that would be hard to do since you can't install CUDA, R packages or the JDK at the moment. Maybe run Docker? Nope. Heck, I'd settle for being able to run tar or rar. Those don't work either. Cmake? Nope, broken. Valgrind? nope. Mono? nope. He's welcome to run the same redis demo he does every tradeshow and pretend everything's hot and ready for action, but it's misleading at best.

UK-AL 10y ago

Literally the only person who I've met thats made an issue out of this

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

manigandham 10y ago

Timing is a "problem" completely in your control - just don't use it. Also applies to the other problem of it being bad or you not liking it - just don't use it. I do agree that OneDrive sucks and is the worst syncing software available.

tacos 10y ago
When I am presented with a tool, a ship date, and a release candidate -- I set my timing and expectations accordingly. When those expectations are not met, you're correct -- I don't use it. I also provide what the Redmond boys call "feedback." Having worked there it's easy for me to spot the knucklehead behaviors they tend to fall into. Inability to name or ship a product plus goofy tech decisions (like shoving everything they can't quite figure out into this "middleware" hole) usually means developer pain ahead.

bitcrazed 10y ago

PM for Bash on Windows here. In answer to some of your questions: "Current beef is the BashOnWindows alpha. Why was this pushed out so early?" We released this feature early because we wanted to get it into the hands of the community in order to learn how they'd use it, what tools they'd run on it, how it would stand-up to real-world use, etc. And the community has been AWESOME, filing lots of bugs (https://aka.ms/winbashgithub https://aka.ms/winbashgithub) and engaging in an overwhelmingly positive and supportive manner. Thanks to all of you that have provided your feedback. "Quite literally nothing works on it." This is just not accurate. There are a large number of things that do work surprisingly well on Bash/WSL, even in this early stage in its development. While Scott and I were on Skype, prepping for //Build, I curl'ed the Redis source tarball, unzipped it, apt-get install build-essential, built, and ran Redis, within minutes, without any modifications. Are there many things that don't work? Yes. Absolutely. We've been very, VERY transparent about this and, in fact, state explicitly in our intro video (https://aka.ms/winbashav https://aka.ms/winbashav) and our announcement (https://aka.ms/winbashann https://aka.ms/winbashann) that there will be many gaps and that lots of things won't work. But let's be fair here, we're talking about an early beta feature in early builds of a beta OS that you choose to download for free. If you don't know that you're going to experience issues, you should not be running Insiders builds. "Ubuntu Trusty was a weird release to begin with" No, it's not. That you don't like it is merely a reality of the Linux ecosystem: Ask 100 Linux dev's which distro to use and you'll get perhaps 20 suggestions - Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, Fedora, CentOs, RedHat, Suse, Gentoo, etc. WSL is designed to be distro agnostic, but we had to start somewhere, so we chose a stable, supported distro's that is very popular with developers - Ubuntu 14.04. We plan on supporting other distro as we expand and improve our implementation of WSL. "it's very difficult to get modern versions of gcc, clang, python 3.5 or even ffmpeg" Really? You're suggesting you don't build everything from source??? ;) Realistically, we're aiming to benefit the most developers possible with this first release - there are far more developers using 14.04 right now than newer versions. And there's FAR more existing code targetting 14.04 era toolsets than the latest and greatest. We'll get there, but you'll have to be just a little patient while we improve the breadth and depth of WSL's implementation.

tacos 10y ago
First of all: software development 101. Is WSL even remotely feature-complete? So let's not call it a beta. I'm not sure why you guys have such a hard-on for Redis, but... whatever. It is clean code that compiles on old toolsets. Much other code does not. Keep rocking those Redis demos, setting and getting values is fascinating. :) Debating distros is pointless but I have noticed that Ruby (and oddly, Microsoft folk) tend to land on Ubuntu. Fine, no big deal. But Trusty was a weird release for them -- and the Canonical packages sort of suck. It's mid-2016. How much C++14 support would you expect to get from installing build-essentials? Shouldn't it compile code I'm writing in Visual Studio 2013? Would you expect to have Python 3.5 available? Would you expect to be able to type "apt-get install ffmpeg"? For various reasons these basic things do not work on Trusty. And then you made it worse by shipping bits that didn't even handle apt-get properly. I'm not anti-Ubuntu other than to point out every bag o' bits reaches a point in its lifecycle where it's a total pain in the ass to set up a modern development environment. Trusty is past that point. It's an unfortunate thing to launch with. Not being able to move forward is also unfortunate. Don't punt on that, trust me. If WSL actually worked, people would be screaming about that instead of all these noise bugs. You'll see. If you want to triage this, get Canonical to offer some more modern packages. Again, I'm not sure why Microsoft hopped into bed with Canonical (especially on the Azure/container side)... but ok. Now get them to ease some pain. I shouldn't have to install a half-dozen shady PPAs to try the stuff that hits the HN homepage every day. And I truly despise this "let's see what the community wants" fake project management technique. You know damn well what features you need to implement. You knew damn well what C99 stuff was needed 10 years ago. "Send us a note if it doesn't work" is lazy, shortsighted and damaging to all parties. It's community management, not engineering. Project Management via squeaky wheel is just stupid in 2016. It didn't work prioritizing C99 features and it's a particularly stupid way to implement a shim library for Linux userspace. This is Open development done wrong.