You still didn't answer the question. If English isn't your first language, then it would explain why what I wrote isn't coherent to you. You're making the sa

You still didn't answer the question. If English isn't your first language, then it would explain why what I wrote isn't coherent to you. You're making the same fallacious assumptions about miners that people do about individuals in tragedy of the commons. You think that the individual cares more about the system rather than their own rational goals, but they don't. The same resource economics that apply to international fishing also apply to bitcoin - both the fisherman and the miners care more about personal gains than they do about the system as a whole. They don't restrain their profit because you project your idealism onto them. And it doesn't matter who promises what - there needs to be a consensus for the change to happen, and that's why bitcoin is flawed. The previous four forks to fix this block size failed, four times, which is evidence to back this up. You can keep spinning the flaw as a speed hole though, it's pretty entertaining :)