5 ms·
I'm sure there's financial sense behind it too. Americans aren't just cowboys firing off their "freedom" guns at every major decision we come to.
by joslin01 10y ago
I'm sure there's financial sense behind it too. Americans aren't just cowboys firing off their "freedom" guns at every major decision we come to.
- toomuchtodo 10y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugged_individualism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugged_individualism Which works fine until you realize you don't operate in a vacuum, and your destiny is influenced by forces outside of your control.
- joslin01 10y agoWhat are you talking about? I said it probably makes financial sense too. I know the HN community abhors things like budgets getting in the way of universal healthcare & longer unemployment benefits, but there's a limit to what can be spent. Let me just say we should be spending a lot less money on war and a lot more money on welfare. Yet let me also say that the genesis of many ghettos was in a "war on poverty" that pushed for low-income housing. You're not being immoral by trying to evaluate each side and it certainly does not make me a rugged individualist.
- toomuchtodo 10y agoI wasn't referring to you in particular, but Americans as a whole. The thought that if you work hard, you will always succeed. This is not the case, of course. I agree with your post.
- joslin01 10y agoI just got done cleaning the dishes when I was like oh wait, maybe he wasn't referring to me? Sure enough. Sorry about that I understand now.
- toomuchtodo 10y agoNo worries at all. 'Tis the nature of text communication!
- Annatar 10y agoWe have several hundred million Americans which are all willing to work very hard, but there is not enough work for them, and what work there is, is not paid sufficiently to be able to live comfortably, or even normally. And here is where the entire concept of if you work hard, you will always succeed shatters: there are roughly 300 million Americans. The industry in which they could have (and many have) worked hard has systematically been outsourced, destroyed, under the idea that "we're going to design it, and they are going to build it, somewhere else, cheaper". Capitalism, except that most of those ~300 million people do not really have the means (intellectual, financial, you name it) to be scientists and engineers. To make matters worse, the American culture has a strong bias towards low-brow making fun of engineering and science (a prominent case in point: "The Big Bang Theory", or shoving sports, in particular "football", down everyone's throats at the expense of more intellectual programs). For instance, "geek" and "nerd" are very American terms which I'm not aware of existing in Europe, where being an engineer or a scientist is celebrated and prestigious. It's the perfect storm, and one which has been systematically brewed for the last 60 years of American history. Anthropologists and sociologists rejoice, for you now have a lifetime opportunity to observe what happens when you have a laissez-faire, hardcore capitalism system without checks and balances.
- toomuchtodo 10y agoSpot on.
- teh64 10y ago> genesis of many ghettos was in a "war on poverty" Do you have any source on this? Because ghettos have been around a lot longer (and many formed around the 1910s): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghetto#History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghetto#History Whereas the "war on poverty" started around 1964: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Poverty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Poverty
- thesimon 10y ago>financial sense behind it too The classic counter example to that would be health care
- st3v3r 10y agoThey kinda are. There are a number of things that have been done elsewhere in the world with success, but when it comes to America, we have to be unique and special.
- toomuchtodo 10y ago"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else." -- Churchill