4 ms·
> And Windows can operate as a server running all sorts of things like Active Directory, Exchange, etc. - that's because Microsoft bundles the software with it
by vertex-four 11y ago
> And Windows can operate as a server running all sorts of things like Active Directory, Exchange, etc. - that's because Microsoft bundles the software with it to allow it to do this, but the underlying operating system remains the same.
Actually, it seriously isn't - Windows Server has a hugely changed set of features compared to Windows on the desktop, from the kernel upwards. The software in question is tied heavily into every piece of the OS - there is almost no major component in Windows 10 that is exactly the same in its equivalent server build. This is very different from both OS X and Linux.
OS X is very much not designed to act as a permanently always-on server in a business-critical capacity - what I'd expect from a server OS. The fact that Apple sell a product called "server" doesn't change that, any more than that XAMPP exists for Windows 10.
To put it in a question - would you run your SaaS off of OS X?
- hughw 11y agoSure, I would. You think a Mac Pro couldn't run Apache, MySQL, and PHP continuously for a year or so? I imagine I'd discover some network tweaks I'd want to make, but I'd be interested to hear what part of that system would prove inadequate.
- chris_wot 11y agoNo, I wouldn't. I think I made that clear already? I'm just saying that I don't understand your definition of a "server OS". Incidentally, my point about Windows Server is the same you have made - except that the kernel architecture is the same. It still runs pretty much this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture_of_Windows_NT#/media/File:Windows_2000_architecture.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture_of_Windows_NT#/me...