3 ms·

Whoa, wasn't expecting to see this, it's been a while. Phrack has a technical depth you don't often see on HN, it's a shame there aren't more people producing

Whoa, wasn't expecting to see this, it's been a while. Phrack has a technical depth you don't often see on HN, it's a shame there aren't more people producing content like this.

blueintegral 10y ago
You might also like PoC||GTFO: https://www.alchemistowl.org/pocorgtfo/ https://www.alchemistowl.org/pocorgtfo/
- nickysielicki 10y ago
  ... Since when is 0x09 followed by 0x10? Why denote your release numbers in hex if you're just going to chicken out when it's time for hex to not be the same as decimal?
  - blueintegral 10y ago
    Apparently it's binary coded decimal.
    - AndyMcConachie 10y ago
      No, it's just incorrect.
      - cremno 10y ago
        blueintegral is correct: https://twitter.com/travisgoodspeed/status/697166343859257347 https://twitter.com/travisgoodspeed/status/69716634385925734...
      - conceit 10y ago
        BCD is a thing. But maybe you are not leet enough to access numbers 0x0a through 0x0f :P
  - lucb1e 10y ago
    As someone who's followed the journal, I'm ashamed to admit I hadn't noticed that... You're right, this is just silly.
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]