3 ms·
This is almost as bad as when people were arguing against long signatures on Usenet. https is the least of your worries in terms of overhead.
by beedogs 10y ago
This is almost as bad as when people were arguing against long signatures on Usenet.
https is the least of your worries in terms of overhead.
- sleepychu 10y ago> benefit immensely from content optimization techniques. And most of them are cost-sensitive because they live in developing countries You can't optimise the size of encrypted content until you've downloaded it. It could go through a third party on your behalf but then they argue, what's the point in the encryption at all.
- cdevs 10y agoFrameworks everywhere! :)