3 ms·
the key word is "potential." I don't see an obvious way to make this much better than existing industrial touchscreen. Also, there are plenty of touchscreen kit
by starkfist 17y ago
the key word is "potential." I don't see an obvious way to make this much better than existing industrial touchscreen. Also, there are plenty of touchscreen kits that don't require taking things apart and figuring out your own operating system.
- stcredzero 17y agoI don't see an obvious way to make this much better than existing industrial touchscreen. There's some nice demo/sales potential, in that it looks a faux iPad. If it's nice close up, then that is one advantage. Also, there are plenty of touchscreen kits that don't require taking things apart and figuring out your own operating system. Part of the fun! In any case, if entire systems this capable are end-consumer commodity items for only $129 now, that fact alone is interesting. It's only a matter of time before someone has a platform at this price point capable of supporting a browser-centric system. For $129, I think a lot of DIY folks would be willing to forgo multitouch and be tethered by a thin power cord while on the couch.