4 ms·
Visual C++ is just the product name, it's branding. It has no functional meaning beyond that. As for the standards, there's pretty good partial support for C++
by Strom 10y ago
Visual C++ is just the product name, it's branding. It has no functional meaning beyond that.
As for the standards, there's pretty good partial support for C++11/14/17. One fairly recent blog post by them has some tables. [1]
[1] https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/01/22/vs-2015-update-2s-stl-is-c17-so-far-feature-complete/ https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/01/22/vs-2015-u...
- StephanTLavavej 10y agoFun fact: the compiler's version (19) is larger than the IDE's version (14) because the compiler predated the addition of "Visual" to the branding. (And the IDE skipped 13, while the compiler didn't.)