5 ms·

Could you explain what you're referring to? It seems like a total non sequitur, since as far as I know, there has never been any pain (or even rumour of pain) i

by dbaupp 10y ago

Could you explain what you're referring to? It seems like a total non sequitur, since as far as I know, there has never been any pain (or even rumour of pain) in a Rust upgrade caused by what libc the compiler uses, but rather breakage in the unstable features that servo uses.

cm3 10y ago
If the official rust+cargo was built statically with musl, then a single download would work on glibc and musl distros. Right now, we don't have a download that works on musl, and one has to bootstrap on a glibc system, targeting musl, which makes it impossible to bootstrap rust+cargo on a musl distro without glibc because bootstrapping requires a snapshot.
- dbaupp 10y ago
  Ah, it is a total non sequitur, unrelated to what servo encounters when changing Rust versions?
  - cm3 10y ago
    I don't understand what you're saying. I suggested that linux builds of rust+cargo ought to be done as musl-static (not for targeting musl) so that a single download works on both Ubuntu and Alpine. Now we have only glibc builds. Yes, it's not related to servo, but it is relevant to you mentioning glibc, though this is off-topic so let's stop arguing.
    - dbaupp 10y ago
      I think you should go back and re-read the conversation, particularly kibwen's comment above and your reply: they seem to be totally unconnected. I was trying to understand how you thought they (Servo upgrading Rust versions and a musl-compiled rustc) were related, I was not arguing. There is in fact no mention of glibc until your comments, nor is there any implication in my comments that I don't understand what musl does nor do I disagree that it is useful (in fact, I used Rust's easy ability to link binaries against musl just a few days ago). This discussion is purely prompted by me trying to understand why you thought it made sense to talk about musl on a seemingly unrelated comment... maybe there was some insightful connection I missed, but it seems not.
      - cm3 10y ago
        You're right.

by dbaupp 10y ago

cm3 10y ago

If the official rust+cargo was built statically with musl, then a single download would work on glibc and musl distros. Right now, we don't have a download that works on musl, and one has to bootstrap on a glibc system, targeting musl, which makes it impossible to bootstrap rust+cargo on a musl distro without glibc because bootstrapping requires a snapshot.

dbaupp 10y ago
Ah, it is a total non sequitur, unrelated to what servo encounters when changing Rust versions?
- cm3 10y ago
  I don't understand what you're saying. I suggested that linux builds of rust+cargo ought to be done as musl-static (not for targeting musl) so that a single download works on both Ubuntu and Alpine. Now we have only glibc builds. Yes, it's not related to servo, but it is relevant to you mentioning glibc, though this is off-topic so let's stop arguing.
  - dbaupp 10y ago
    I think you should go back and re-read the conversation, particularly kibwen's comment above and your reply: they seem to be totally unconnected. I was trying to understand how you thought they (Servo upgrading Rust versions and a musl-compiled rustc) were related, I was not arguing. There is in fact no mention of glibc until your comments, nor is there any implication in my comments that I don't understand what musl does nor do I disagree that it is useful (in fact, I used Rust's easy ability to link binaries against musl just a few days ago). This discussion is purely prompted by me trying to understand why you thought it made sense to talk about musl on a seemingly unrelated comment... maybe there was some insightful connection I missed, but it seems not.
    - cm3 10y ago
      You're right.