3 ms·
> Most other cultures were the same way. Everyone having sex with everyone made for a pretty bad society. The opposite of true. I recommend "Sex at Dawn" for a
by whiddershins 11y ago
> Most other cultures were the same way. Everyone having sex with everyone made for a pretty bad society.
The opposite of true. I recommend "Sex at Dawn" for a good treatment of this topic
https://www.amazon.com/Sex-Dawn-Stray-Modern-Relationships-ebook/dp/B007679QTG?ie=UTF8&btkr=1&redirect=true&ref_=dp-kindle-redirect https://www.amazon.com/Sex-Dawn-Stray-Modern-Relationships-e...
TL;DR "Everyone having sex with everyone" pretty much maintained social cohesion in small societies for millenia.
- rat87 11y ago> In opposition to what the authors see as the 'standard narrative' of human sexual evolution, they contend having multiple sexual partners was common and accepted in the environment of evolutionary adaptedness. > The book generated a great deal of publicity in the popular press, where it was met with generally positive reviews. A number of scholars from related academic disciplines such as anthropology, evolutionary psychology, primatology, biology, and sexology have commented on the book; most have been critical of the book's methodology and some of its conclusions, although some academics have praised the book.
- MustardTiger 11y agoPopsci is not compelling. That book was eviscerated by actual scientists.
- Mz 11y agoYou might try reading books by Frans de Waal. He makes a compelling argument that human biology suggests that monogamous pair bonding is a very long standing human tendency.