3 ms·
I'm tired of this argument. A john pays a prostitute for their services for their own enjoyment. A porn actor isn't paid by their costar, they're paid by the pr
by justinlardinois 10y ago
I'm tired of this argument. A john pays a prostitute for their services for their own enjoyment. A porn actor isn't paid by their costar, they're paid by the production company so it can sell the recording.
It's like comparing filming a romantic comedy to a lonely guy paying an escort to hang out with him. There's a bigger difference than just the fact that a camera is involved.
Also not really into the contract angle either. Why can't a consenting adult sell their vote?
- yarou 10y agoThere isn't really much difference other than a camera being involved. In fact, I'd argue porn is more exploitative than prostitution. And if you think filming porn is akin to filming a romantic comedy, you haven't seen Hot Girls Wanted.
- justinlardinois 10y ago> if you think filming porn is akin to filming a romantic comedy That's not the comparison I was making.