4 ms·
Go to school, kid: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/property_rights.asp http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/property_rights.asp
by goldbrick 10y ago
Go to school, kid: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/property_rights.asp http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/property_rights.asp
- djschnei 10y agoI've been studying economic theory for the majority of my life, have a PhD, and I am a fellow at one of the most prestigious econ think tanks in the world. I've gone to school. I do appreciate being called a kid though. Is your point that they need a blank check to protect property rights? Because that's preposterous and would only demonstrate your own misunderstanding of property rights (or rights in general).
- goldbrick 10y agoLet's see your dissertation then.
- djschnei 10y agofor professional reason (i.e. mixing personal social media activity with links to my professional work) I can't post that here. Against our social media policy, and is generally in bad taste. Undoubtedly, you will take that as "I can't since it doesn't exist", but I couldn't really care less.
- djschnei 10y agoIf you care to educate yourself on the point I was making: https://fee.org/articles/capitalism-and-cooperation/ https://fee.org/articles/capitalism-and-cooperation/
- goldbrick 10y agoCtrl+f "property rights": Phrase not found -- I really don't understand why I'm supposed to slog through such bloviating. https://fee.org/search/?q=protection%20property%20rights https://fee.org/search/?q=protection%20property%20rights seems pretty clear they understand the government is responsible for protecting property rights, which is a prerequisite for capitalism.
- djschnei 10y agoBecause you asserted that there is some invisible, omniscient, 'so complicated we couldn't possibly understand it' work being done by the government in order to keep the boat afloat. My claim is that that's largely a ridiculous claim. And the government IS responsible for protecting property rights, I never suggested otherwise. That responsibility doesn't afford them (we the collective) a blank check. Is the irony seriously eluding you?! You're saying in order to protect our property rights, they need to further violate our property rights! For the love of god... In one sentence you claim we never own our property, the next you say they're in charge of protecting our rights as property owners... You literally contradict yourself in one sentence...