9 ms·
I really wish Java developers would just use java.util.logging and be done with it.
by chvid 11y ago
I really wish Java developers would just use java.util.logging and be done with it.
- tadfisher 11y agoThat's an all-or-nothing solution. As third-party libraries often use alternative loggers, and java.util.logging cannot be substituted on the classpath (because of the java.* namespace), then using JUL locks consumers out of using their own logging facade as it cannot be bridged to SLF4J.
- electrum 11y agojava.util.logging can be bridged into SLF4J using the jul-to-slf4j bridge.
- twic 11y agoI really wish java.util.logging was good enough to just use and be done with it. But it isn't.