3 ms·
I cannot read that any other way except to intentionally mislead people for a greater impact on the story. It was a bit careless on their part. Most likely th
by kafkaesq 11y ago
I cannot read that any other way except to intentionally mislead people for a greater impact on the story.
It was a bit careless on their part. Most likely the author simply didn't know when the uninvited visit occurred didn't think to double check.
In general I don't see much benefit in imputing malicious motives to others, when far simpler explanations will suffice.
- wutbrodo 11y agoThis would be a reasonable approach if we weren't talking about a piece of published journalism. That makes it both more unlikely that it was accidental (due to a higher bar of fact-checking), and more blameworthy even if it was due to negligence.
- kafkaesq 11y agoWhat can I say? If you're looking for bad actors and intentional wrongdoers behind every mishap in the world... then that's the kind of world you'll end up living in.