Yes, I understand that triggers will save every data mutation, but no matter what you do second replica is not going to see them synchronously. It's always behi

Yes, I understand that triggers will save every data mutation, but no matter what you do second replica is not going to see them synchronously. It's always behind and inconsistent, if first one dies - you lose some data. EDIT: Maybe you should rename it to something like "trigger-based asynchronous replication", so people would get the right idea about the guarantees it provides.