5 ms·
Threatening as in a threat to his own campaign. Good point, insignificant would have been clearer. I'm sorry, did I offend a reader of his blog? Adams writes a
by kelukelugames 10y ago
Threatening as in a threat to his own campaign. Good point, insignificant would have been clearer.
I'm sorry, did I offend a reader of his blog? Adams writes about himself being a weasel and manipulating journalists.
- coldtea 10y ago>I'm sorry, did I offend a reader of his blog? If by reader you mean someone who read his blog maybe 4-5 times total in the last 10 years (and doesn't even own any Dilbert book), then, still no (ie., no I was not offended). I made a statement concerning the lack of any practical proof/content in the comment. As I said, he may very well be a weasel (and I could not care less, I might add) but that's not something that's concluded from the contents of the comment.
- kelukelugames 10y agoYou write a lot for someone who could care less and isn't offended.
- coldtea 10y agoAnd you analyse people's souls a lot for someone who is not a psychiatrist. I'm just chatty. I write a lot for every topic I'm interested in, as you can plainly see from my comment backlog. Doesn't need to be offended on behalf of Adams to respond -- I'm just the kind of person that doesn't let an inconsistent argument slip by. And I saw "Adams is XXX because he said YYY is OK" without YYY being either bad or any justification for the XXX.
- kelukelugames 10y agoYeeeeesh, over analyzing Internet comments. You must be fun at parties.