> If people are able to "pay" for better, faster internet access, how can we regulate it as a public utility for everyone? One might argue that it seems "unfair

> If people are able to "pay" for better, faster internet access, how can we regulate it as a public utility for everyone? One might argue that it seems "unfair" (for certain definitions). I fail to see how this has anything to do with network neutrality. You pay for your internet connection, I pay for mine. There's nothing unfair about me having a 100M connection and you having a 1G connection. Network neutrality only bans preferential treatment of service providers, it has nothing to do with who has what kind of connection. > This is related to internet billing: Do we bill the downloader? The uploader? How do we measure it? How do we verify the measurement? What if someone MITM injects packets? Internet access billing has fairly established practices. There are no unknowns there. It's either flat rate in retail or 95th percentile in wholesale. Metered billing is an anomaly that can be largely be done away with. MITM packet injection is not really something you have to worry about. Suffice to say spoofing can be largely prevented. > We need to make decisions and figure things out in order to get internet to the level of, say, electricity. There really isn't much to figure out. You can sell Internet access almost the same way you sell electricity.