The actual discussions are more nuanced. What you have determined from what you've read or heard does not align with what I have determined. Having listened to

The actual discussions are more nuanced. What you have determined from what you've read or heard does not align with what I have determined. Having listened to the conversation that causes the reaction "Trump is for nuclear proliferation," I don't think that's what he was describing. What he said was that North Korea has nuclear weapons but no carrier system. That they will have a carrier system soon. That he'd rather Japan be able to defend themselves equally against NK if the need should arise, and not for the United States to be in charge of keeping Japan safe. That is what he said.