3 ms·
You are assuming that rational decision making can't lead to mass-slaughtering cattle. Also you're assuming that everyone has accurate evidence about the impac
by powera 10y ago
You are assuming that rational decision making can't lead to mass-slaughtering cattle.
Also you're assuming that everyone has accurate evidence about the impact of weather rituals. In a society without written records, how is that supposed to magically happen?
- mannykannot 10y agoAt most, he is assuming that there is no rational explanation in this particular case of mass slaughter. FWIW, I am going to assign that a high confidence score until I see actual evidence to the contrary. Saying "maybe there's an explanation" for every case does not advance the discussion. Saying "maybe there's an explanation" for every datum that does not fit your prior assumptions pretty much rules out statistical thinking, even if you otherwise have the capability.