3 ms·
What you and others get wrong in that analysis is that you don't take into account that just one algorithm have to learn something then all the others can do th
by ThomPete 11y ago
What you and others get wrong in that analysis is that you don't take into account that just one algorithm have to learn something then all the others can do the same.
Point machine learning towards a problem and things that normally was cumbersome and took several people to do is suddenly done in the fraction of a second.
It's like claiming that if an alien race landed on planet earth with superior skills and superior technology it wouldn't effect the human ability to survive because we endured battles with other species before. We can't use history to teach us much since the opponent is different.
This is not speculation anymore. This is unfolding right in front of us and we better take it serious.
- chrisco255 11y agoMachine learning is still far from automating most services. If anything, machine learning will create as many jobs as it will destroy.
- ThomPete 11y agoYou must be able to provide some examples of jobs that will be created. So when machine learning will remove the need for radiologist and many surgeons as it's already well underway to. What areas is it that these doctors will then be able to work in thats going to be of value? It's ironic how steadfast many of you are in this idea that more jobs will be created when there is no evidence it's the case and the new jobs that are created require much less than whatever it replaced. You are also confusing globalization with actual job creation in the west.