4 ms·
> it is way easier to go to college and get a formal education in science, math, or engineering, and pursue an ongoing adhoc self-directed education in the arts
by goldbrick 10y ago
> it is way easier to go to college and get a formal education in science, math, or engineering, and pursue an ongoing adhoc self-directed education in the arts and humanities in your remaining decades of life, than the other way around.
This isn't really true. You can't really have any kind of art career, for example, if you don't go to art school. Meanwhile, tons of companies will happily hire whatever chumps code bootcamps are churning out.
- kingnothing 10y agoI'd wager you have a better shot of getting a paying "art career" by starting with a STEM degree and trying to move to that field than getting an art degree. There's a reason we have a societal meme about art majors working as baristas and waiters -- it's more or less a degree that does not lead to a relevant career.
- goldbrick 10y agoI don't know exactly what you mean by "art career" with quote marks specifically, but good luck trying. The fact that art majors are baristas and waiters is evidence of my point, not against it. Obtaining an art career is difficult even with the degree.
- loco5niner 10y ago> You can't really have any kind of art career, for example, if you don't go to art school. This can't possibly be true.
- vasilipupkin 10y agoIf you are a genius artist that happens to get lucky, sure. But if you want to have an actual art career, it will be tough without art school
- goldbrick 10y agoI actually do know what I'm talking about here, and it is true. The art industry has way more supply than demand. This is why art schools can still charge what, purely by the numbers, looks like a bad deal. Some people really want to work in art, and even if you end up "only" managing a gallery, you have to have the right credentials.