FWIW, your article says that the remaining Powerwall is designed exactly for this purpose. > The larger Powerwall was positioned as a longer-term back up power

FWIW, your article says that the remaining Powerwall is designed exactly for this purpose. > The larger Powerwall was positioned as a longer-term back up power supply, which GTM noted was looking like a hard sell, with other market alternatives that were priced far below the $3500 price tag. > The remaining 6.4 kwh device has less capacity, and is designed more to shift the load of available power, such as from a solar panel, to times when the production of such energy is lower.