4 ms·
A lot of companies do use SharePoint that way (including Microsoft), they just heavily modify the look, and in some cases (Microsoft kb articles, as an example)
by tallanvor 11y ago
A lot of companies do use SharePoint that way (including Microsoft), they just heavily modify the look, and in some cases (Microsoft kb articles, as an example) have publishing flows to export static pages to be cached by CDNs.
- Jedd 11y agoI don't doubt some do this - I don't know how you'd tell from looking at a (heavily skinned) site. But it sounds like MS hasn't done this here - they've designed and built a new documentation repository. More power to them, btw. Most (HN) people's complaints sound fairly cosmetic - easy enough to adjust. Sensible URL's are probably worth the cost of conversion alone. But my point is/was that this doesn't appear to be a re-skinning of Sharepoint - it looks like (yet another) bespoke DMS.