3 ms·
You're assuming your points were valid. Since you didn't really argue them, they might not be. In that case, you aren't justified in getting angry at this artic
by Hondor 10y ago
You're assuming your points were valid. Since you didn't really argue them, they might not be. In that case, you aren't justified in getting angry at this article any more than you are in getting angry at every paper using stats ever published. Perhaps this is one of the rare good ones.
- qaq 10y agoI stated 2 things (not very elaborately): 1) There are too many factors that affect crime rates that are not accounted for by this study. 2) Correlation does not prove causation