3 ms·
I am glad to see they acknowledge MSDN is bad. I fear they will make it worse but well, we'll see. Microsoft has been surprising these times.
by Iv 10y ago
I am glad to see they acknowledge MSDN is bad. I fear they will make it worse but well, we'll see. Microsoft has been surprising these times.
- pjmlp 10y agoJust try to get Google or Apple OSes documentation. MSDN is the best documentation I ever seen from OS vendors. Not to mention the mainframe, commercial UNIX and embedded real time OSes, even worse than those mentioned above.
- nailer 10y agoredhat.com/docs and (back when Sun was a thing) docs.sun.com were great.
- pjmlp 10y agoWhere is the Red Hat documentation about the programming languages, respective libraries and IDEs delivered in a Red Hat ISO? This one looks very poor versus MSDN content. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Developer_Guide/index.html https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterp...
- oblio 10y agoI'm pretty sure they rely on the respective upstreams to provide those. Red Hat's OS docs are very good. I'm not sure it's their job to document what you're asking for.
- pjmlp 10y agoIf we are comparing them to MSDN quality, it is. MSDN documents everything that Microsoft delivers to Windows developers, OS, programming languages, frameworks, IDEs, system administration,knowledge base, magazines and books.