4 ms·
Ok, now that i think about it. Maybe a chemical response is more effective. What about having a risk, recovery time. If you post, you can have karma at risk,
by jdavid 19y ago
Ok, now that i think about it. Maybe a chemical response is more effective.
What about having a risk, recovery time.
If you post, you can have karma at risk, if it gets a few negative responses, it can recover, but if it gets 3 or more, the karma is lost.
We can all know what it means to give 3 strikes, so it only takes 3 of us to call it spam, while the post is risking karma for each link.
I feel like this has a lot in common with learning systems in how neurons sum signals and vote an outcome.